Ethical dilemma: Should knowledge be free? - Michael Vazquez and Will Kanwischer
BY x7mjy
June 24, 2025•
Public
Private
4636 views
Exploring Intellectual Property in Magical and Non-Magical Contexts
The Setting: Mystical Ockham
Ockham is renowned for its college of magic.
Genius spellcasters publish incantations in enchanted scrolls.
Aspiring wizards study these scrolls, particularly for mathematical magic.
The Dilemma
Scrolls are expensive and often unaffordable.
A friend offers illegal copies free of charge.
Ethical decision: Use counterfeit scrolls or respect creators' rights?
Intellectual Property Rights
Mages' livelihood and reputation depend on their work's sale and recognition.
The system aims to elevate quality magic by making it accessible.
Philosophical Considerations
John Locke's View: Intellectual property mirrors rights over cultivated land, a rivalrous good, implying exclusive ownership.
Hegel's Perspective: Control over intellectual creations is a part of personal fulfillment; unauthorized use reduces creators' control over their legacy.
Commodification Argument: Some thinkers argue that treating knowledge as a commodity can debase it, suggesting all knowledge should be free or appropriately credited.
Ethical Questions and Practical Considerations
Even if uncompensated, creators may feel injustice if their work is used without credit.
There's a debate on whether intellectual property rights should always be respected, or if there are exceptions.
Contextual Examples
During emergencies (e.g., COVID-19), access to information was prioritized over compensation.
Comparison with grain distribution during famines by David Hume.
Decisions and Reflections
Assess circumstances under which intellectual property rights may be overlooked for the greater good.
Contemplate the balance between the pursuit of knowledge and fair compensation for creators.
Ethical dilemma: Should knowledge be free? - Michael Vazquez and Will Kanwischer