Is Nano-Hydroxyapatite Toothpaste Replacing Fluoride?
BY mi1wh
July 1, 2025•
Public
Private
6621 views
Nano Hydroxyapatite Toothpaste vs. Fluoride
Introduction
Presenter: Whitney, a registered dental hygienist and a doctorate student in health science.
Purpose: To clarify the debate on social media regarding Nano Hydroxyapatite (NHA) toothpaste as an alternative to fluoride toothpaste.
Key Points on Fluoride
Gold Standard: Fluoride is considered the gold standard in evidence-based dental care.
Effectiveness: Better at combating acids in the mouth and more effective in acidic environments where cavities develop.
Regulation: Fluoride toothpaste is subject to stringent regulatory approval by agencies like the FDA, ensuring product consistency and safety.
Nano Hydroxyapatite
Promise: Science shows promising results for tooth remineralization with 10% Nano Hydroxyapatite containing true nanosized particles.
Dissolution: Begins at a pH of 5.5, making it less resistant compared to fluoride.
Lack of Regulation: No regulatory approval in the US, raising concerns about product claims and effectiveness.
Cost: Generally more expensive, with potential for low-quality, inexpensive alternatives containing less than 10% NHA or microsized particles.
Concerns and Considerations
Regulatory Approval: Lack of third-party verification makes it difficult to recommend NHA over fluoride.
Product Claims: Difficulty in verifying product claims on concentration and particle size/shape due to absence of oversight.
Financial Aspects: High costs can mislead those avoiding fluoride due to misinformation, leading them to purchase unnecessarily expensive toothpaste.
Recommendations
Educational Approach: Encourage patients to consult their dental providers and focus on evidence-based information for oral health.
Provisional Use: Suggest brands of NHA with potential 10% nanoparticle concentration for individuals refusing fluoride, with transparency about uncertainties.
Emphasis on Proper Care: Highlight the importance of proper brushing and flossing techniques, offering a free oral care guide.
Conclusion
Stance: While the presenter is open to the future potential of NHA if regulation improves, fluoride remains the recommended option due to its established effectiveness and regulatory support.
Call to Action: Educate on the basis of science, ensuring informed decisions for maintaining dental health.
The content is organized around the comparison of Nano Hydroxyapatite and Fluoride, highlighting research, regulatory, and consumer aspects for an informed decision.
Is Nano-Hydroxyapatite Toothpaste Replacing Fluoride?