Discussion on the drawbacks of using pixels for font sizes and element dimensions.
Conversion from pixels to Rems for better accessibility.
Accessibility Issues with Pixels
Defining font sizes in pixels is not accessible as users can't adjust font size in some browsers.
Default browser base font size is usually 16 pixels.
Browsers like Firefox and Chrome allow users to customize font sizes, impacting the interpretation of Rem units.
Comparison: Pixels vs Rems
Pixels are absolute units; their size is constant and doesn't adapt to browser settings.
Rems are relative units; their size adapts based on the user's browser settings.
Impact of Using Pixels on Layout
Using pixels can result in inconsistent and cramped layouts when browser font size settings are changed.
Recommendation: Use Rems
Switching to Rems improves accessibility and readability.
Rems adapt better to user preferences and browser settings.
Drawbacks of Pixels in Media Queries
Pixels can cause design issues when the browser font size is increased.
Using Rems or Em units is recommended for responsiveness and usability.
Conversion Techniques from Pixels to Rems
CSS Custom Properties:
Define pixel values as CSS variables and convert them into Rems.
A trade-off is the inability to use CSS variables in media queries.
Sass/SCSS:
Use functions to automate the conversion process.
Sass functions can be used within media queries for easier management.
Avoid 62.5% Hack:
Previously used to simplify conversion by setting the HTML font size to 62.5% (making 1 Rem = 10 pixels).
This method has drawbacks, including breaking compatibility with third-party packages.
Course Offering
A mention of a course on responsive design for beginners, including building a website from scratch using Figma designs and setting up Sass styles. Offers are available with discounts.
Conclusion
Encouragement to use relative units like Rems for better accessibility and user experience on web standards.